Dispensing Machines, Telepharmacists Fill Void Left by Closing Pharmacies

David Wahlberg of the Wicsconsin State Journal wrote a great article yesterday about the problem of vanishing pharmacies in Wisconsin, and the rise of outpatient telepharmacy programs. He explains why pharmacies are closing (mostly high costs, and mentions that pharmacists are expensive) and how telepharmacies and Dispensing Machines like InstyMeds' are taking the place of full-blown pharmacies:

InstyMeds machines

In some small towns where pharmacies have vanished, InstyMeds machines prevent patients from having to make trips to other cities.

...

About 200 InstyMeds machines are being used in 25 states, according to Minnesota-based InstyMeds. That includes 45 in Wisconsin, 34 of which are in rural clinics and hospitals.

While the machines fill a gap, an important connection is lost.

“It cuts pharmacists out of the loop, and we lose personal contact with patients,” said Mike Peterson, pharmacy director at Upland Hills.

Video connections

Pharmacists are in the loop but miles away at remote dispensing sites, which use video connections to preserve pharmacy services in some rural communities. They’re also called telepharmacy sites.

Wisconsin approved the sites two years ago, and rules on how to run them took effect this month. Sixteen states allow them, said Ann Rathke, telepharmacy coordinator in North Dakota, which in 2001 became the first state to approve the sites.

So far, four telepharmacies are operating in Wisconsin: at Marshfield Clinic centers in Mercer and Lake Hallie, near Chippewa Falls; and in Gillett and Mountain, small towns northwest of Green Bay where the clinics are owned by Community Memorial Hospital in Oconto Falls.

Pharmacy technicians work at the sites. As the tech prepares medications, a pharmacist consults from another location through a video screen. When the tech hands over the drugs to the patient, the pharmacist appears on another video screen to give instructions and answer questions.

...

But with pharmacy techs making roughly $30,000 a year, compared with about $110,000 for pharmacists, the sites allow service in rural locations that don’t have enough business to justify having a pharmacist on site. “It’s a compromise,” Wunrow said.

Definitely check out the WSJ article. There are pictures, a flash graphic and a video included as well:

Recent Telepharmacy Study Round-Up

Jayashri Sankaranarayanan published a Viewpoint in Medscape today, about a study in the Journal of the American Pharmacists Association from August 2009 called "Exploring the formation of patient satisfaction in rural community telepharmacies" that attempted to assess patient satisfaction with outpatient telepharmacies in rural communities. The study concluded:

A previous application of this instrument in a traditional community pharmacy setting yielded two interrelated latent constructs ("friendly explanation" and "managing therapy"). Our analysis suggests that the formation of patient satisfaction in rural community telepharmacies is much simpler in that patients form a single construct exhibiting high mean and median values. Anecdotal evidence from the literature suggests that the formation of a single construct reflects patients' desire to retain a point of access to health care in their communities.

Jayashri's analysis of the study is a little more straightforward:

Low response rate (24%) may have biased the study findings because highly satisfied patients may have responded to the survey and dissatisfied patients may not have responded. Study results are limited to telepharmacies in the Midwest. Because some patients may want to keep a point of access to healthcare in their communities as opposed to driving outside of the community to receive it, they may have reported high satisfaction with telepharmacies.

This is one of the first studies to evaluate patient satisfaction with telepharmacy. If patient behaviors are consistent with patient values, telepharmacy may complement the rural community pharmacy and have the potential to remain profitable while improving quality of care.

Sounds like in any case, patients were able to get the drugs they needed, which might not have been possible locally, without a telepharmacy.

Upon realizing I missed this study back Fall 2009, I looked back through PubMed for more interesting stuff I might have missed and found a couple more.

Implementing after-hours pharmacy coverage for critical access hospitals in northeast Minnesota (Sept. 2008)

CONCLUSION: Using Internet-based health IT, pharmacists from a metropolitan (hub) hospital with round-the-clock pharmacist coverage participated in the care of patients at a number of small, rural hospitals and helped ensure that those patients received safe and effective medication therapy. The coverage provided by pharmacists at the hub hospital improved nursing satisfaction with the overall quality of pharmacy services provided by both the hub hospital and the local onsite pharmacists.

Implementation of home-based medication order entry at a community hospital (Nov. 2009)

CONCLUSION: A community-based hospital successfully implemented a home-based medication order-entry program. The program alleviated the shortage of pharmacists during spontaneous surges of medication orders.